DCSIMG

Paedophile pensioner from South Reston loses bid to clear name

editorial image

editorial image

A paedophile pensioner from South Reston who raped and molested a young child has failed in an appeal court bid to clear his name.

Ambrose Francis Clifton took sickening photographs of the child abused, which were found during a police search of his home.

The 72-year-old, formerly of Field View Road, South Reston, was jailed for 14 years at Lincoln Crown Court in December 2012 after being found guilty of a string of offences against the youngster. He challenged his convictions at London’s Criminal Appeal Court, with his lawyers arguing he did not receive a fair trial.

But his appeal was thrown out by three of the country’s top judges, who said there was no reason to doubt the safety of the jury’s guilty verdicts.

The court heard Clifton’s crimes came to light in 2010, when the victim told their mother what had happened and the police were contacted.

When officers went to his home, they discovered indecent photographs of the child and also found material on his computer which suggested he had a sexual interest in children.

The court heard the victim was so traumatised by the ordeal that they later refused to talk about the incident and so prosecutors relied on the mother’s testimony during Clifton’s trial.

Clifton denied any wrongdoing, but was found guilty of rape, sexual assault, causing a child to engage in sexual activity and taking indecent photographs of a child.

His lawyers argued his convictions should be overturned because the child’s version of events could not be tested properly, as the child did not give evidence directly, and there were inconsistencies in the account.

But, dismissing the appeal, Lord Justice Fulford said the trial judge handled these issues carefully and his directions to the jury were ‘unimpeachable’. Sitting with Mr Justice Hickinbottom and Mrs Justice Simler, he added: “The weaknesses and inconsistencies in the child’s evidence were readily identifiable.”

“The jury was well placed to test whether these allegations were true to whether, for instance, the child had been persuaded to provide a false story.

“The judge’s approach was markedly careful and it was appropriate.”

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page